Peter Joseph Zeitgeist Debates Stefan Molyneux Freedomainradio

Peter Joseph Zeitgeist Debates Stefan Molyneux Freedomainradio

Stefan Molyneux debates Peter Joseph of the Zeitgeist Movement on the nature and reality of the free market system. “If I hear the word “truncated” one more time, Imma propagate some structural violence” youtu.be/2ZhqsA57r3A
Video Rating: / 5

Connect with Atheist Adam:
Facebook
Facebook
Google+
Google+
http://www.AtheistAdam.com/peter-joseph-zeitgeist-debates-stefan-molyneux-freedomainradio/
Instagram
PINTEREST
PINTEREST
RSS
Follow by Email
SHARE
  • jermy zelig

    49:42 OHH SHIT

  • Fernando Marturet

    Peter Joseph Watson is a word salad lol.

  • Greg Bennett

    I think what peter joseph is trying to say is that if the free market worked then the current state of the world would have never happened. Even if you removed all governments, eventually businesses would form cartels which are inherently states. It's the natural progression of all systems to combine and cooperate and defend itself.

  • Greg Bennett

    lol i agree with PJ but he lost this debate.

  • Mr Heyman

    This Joseph guy is not only disrespectful, but he's reasoning is flawed on every level. He didn't bring one good argument. I hope molyneux wont spend more time on him.

  • Hush & Hum

    A great debate and I can understand and appreciate both sides but in the end Stefan is voting for (honest) competition and Peter is voting for enabling co-operation by providing basic necessities to everyone and freeing people of the struggle to survive. IF everyone has food, education, healthcare and energy then we no longer need to compete, co-operation will always be a better solution in the end. Up till now this hasn't been possible, but I believe with todays technology it should be.

  • Loud CPT Crunch

    communist ideology, which is indeed the ideology of joseph no matter how hard he tried to laugh that off, can be refuted with one simple point. if people are inherently evil and greedy why would you pool all resources in the hands of one group? the idea of the free market is to remove outside influence and allow you to trade freely. the socialist communist system gives all the power and control of resources to someone else.. if you want to trade and maximize your potential worth why do you want to establish a singular group outside your control to determine that for you? its madness i tell ya

  • danz177

    You cannot argue for this profit based system, because profit motives lead to consolidation of power and monopolization of resources. The money based trade for profit will lead to the extinction of the human being. If we use technical solutions to create abundance and provide for all people, we remove the profit motive and allow for effiecent allocation and use of our collective resources. We are headed for an automated, atrificially intelligently lead robotic labor force, within the next two decades, there will be no jobs for anyone to make money, so eventually we will have to ask the question of "What are we doing?". Then we will have Peter Joseph and Jacque Fresco's vision to at least consider as an option, before the Elites decided to just Nuke the bottom 6 billion "bottom feeders" as they would invariably refer to us.

  • Nightmare Jaiden

    And this guy keeps bringing up love making as rape. Let's say their is a global cataclysm and a woman may not want to fuck some old ugly dood, but for the existence of humanity she is forced to then yes, in context, it is rape

  • Nightmare Jaiden

    Molyneux has quite an ego to protect. He desperately needs mushrooms

  • Nightmare Jaiden

    Molyneux's arguments are too short minded to argue with this guy about economics and structural violence

  • Arrygon

    they are not economists nor business men ..thats the problem in every government..useless qualification ….."smart ecperts" without any experience

  • Arrygon

    never do any useful job …