Best of Sam Harris Amazing Arguments And Clever Comebacks Part 1

If you like what I do, donate a to my Patreon channel. www.patreon.com/AgatanFnd?ty=h

Best of Sam Harris Amazing Arguments And Clever Comebacks Part 1
To support this channel or to get more involved please go to: www.patreon.com/AgatanFnd?ty=h
You can also visit our Facebook page, website or Youtube channel at:
www.facebook.com/AgAtAnFoundation
www.agatanfoundation.com/
www.youtube.com/channel/UCb062gdTsC6FPvnzCPVvsTw

To watch the full videos used in this video please go to:



Connect with Atheist Adam:
Facebook
Facebook
Google+
Google+
http://www.AtheistAdam.com/best-of-sam-harris-amazing-arguments-and-clever-comebacks-part-1/
Instagram
PINTEREST
PINTEREST
RSS
Follow by Email
SHARE
  • coleaddison

    Could someone tell me how many people died in the Salem Witch Trials and during what years?  If you could do the same for the Inquisitions, that would be great.  In the meantime, here are the generally-accepted death counts from atheist regimes of the 20th Century (as in, we have colored pictures):   Mao Ze-Dong (China, 1958-61 and 1966-69, Tibet 1949-50) 49-78,000,00 people murdered,  Jozef Stalin (USSR 1932-39 only) 15,000,000 people murdered,  Pol Pot (Cambodia, 1975-79) 1,700,000 people murdered,  Kim II Sung (North Korea 1948-94) 1.6 million people murdered,  Tito (Yugoslavia 1945-1987) 570,000 people murdered,  Suharto (Communists 1967-66) 500,000 people murdered,  Ante Pavelic (Croatia 1941-45) 359,000 people murder, Ho Chi Min (Vietnam 1953-56) 200,000 people murdered, Vladimir Ilich Lenin (USSR, 1917-20) 30,000 people murdered, Adolf Hitler (Germany 1939-1945) 12,000,000 people murdered.

  • Peet

    When did I realize I was God?
    Well, I was praying and I suddenly realized I was talking to myself.

  • SS Tao Esoteric Genius

    what would be soo funny if Sam Harris was born in his next life as a Jew lol

  • Christ David

    slams one system of belief only to be part of another one: science.

  • Patrik Nilsson

    Why are atheists so mad at God?

  • Mrigank

    guy loves Elvis

  • Charles Hartmann

    This video sucks because you do not get the context of what he is responding do. How the fuck can you tell how good the comeback is if you don't hear the initial statement. This is a pathetic echo chamber of which Mr Harris would not associate with.
    Pathetic.

  • Johan Nooyen

    God answers all your prayers.
    And sometimes the answer is: No!

  • Lama Kasabli

    I'm against his kind of thinking this is so bad

  • Sean Hayes

    Can't stand deluded Deepak who uses pseudoscience to convince his sheep followers who eat up his spiritual nonsense. Delighted Sam obliterated him.

  • Alanias Druid

    You are re uploading and cutting together clips of other peoples work, without adding anything of your own. How dare you ask for Patreon support, wtf, lol!

  • chewbacca

    i love the sound of his smooth voice and his incredible diction

  • Stephen Ireland

    Gods foolishness is greater than mans wisdom".   Satan loves the sinner to lean on his own fallen sinful understand and reason away their god and only savour.   God says.  "Come let us reason together"  but we need to come with humility before god. This guy is like a child trying to tell his parents he knows better. He may need some lashings with the cain!

  • avoeloos2

    @henry alvadenying god does not make you intelligent or ur reasoning logic.

  • Josh Stewart

    Harris just nailed Rabbi Wolpe's coffin with that Elvis analogy. So satisfyingly executed too'; Wolpe was interrupting Harris throughout with cheap jabs and then gets the haymaker of Harris' wit in return. Loved it.

  • naruto7424

    Sam Harris is like Gregory House.

  • Hans Mercurio

    I have liked the wit and humor of Harris and Hitchens as opposed to the dryness of Dennett and Dawkins, however it is important to not get caught up in their clever lines to the point that you assume that people of faith are solely made up of the characteristics that Harris chooses to give them. He ridicules people of faith for believing in a personal God (as though this represents some type of mass psychosis). He does this, of course, because he knows he can fool and lull some people into accepting that ridicule as having scored points for his arguments against a personal God. Some people will allow themselves to be "stroked" and "petted" by his amusing words and they feel fortunate that they are not the ones being laughed at — so they join the Pied Piper as he beckons them to follow him. Do you think Harris says ANYTHING without a purpose of persuasion? He knows that, since a majority of the population believes in a personal God, his audience must be made up of the same demographic characteristic, so he must get as many of them on his side as he can by using humor and by referring to them as "most of our neighbors" (note that he cleverly constructs an "us vs. them" scenario and who wants to be the "them" when they are being made fun of?).
    If he simply lays on the table the choice that this unbelievably intricate universe (choice #1): simply POOF came into being without being able to explain the catalyst versus (choice #2): some conscious being or a collection of conscious beings purposefully creating the universe, Harris loses traction because choice #1 has absolutely no explanation. Most self-professed "intellectuals" believe it shows a necessary humility to say that they do not yet know what started it all and at the same time they are too conceited to allow for the fact that they were created by a higher being — they vigorously shun the thought that there can be a being of greater intelligence than themselves.
    People, don't simply follow Harris because you don't want to be the "them" that he is laughing at; think for yourselves. Then, if you truly side with him, you have done so because of your own intellect and not because he hypnotized you with clever words. The same goes for disagreeing with him.

  • Captain Jack Sparrow

    This guy fucks.

  • Ice Warrior

    That's very unusual I expected some knowledge concerning God's standards which surpass a humans perspective on human interactions. God does not possess or rather is provoked by any degree of sexual intercourse regarding heterosexuals and is instead pleased by fidelity that these individuals exhibit not the mere act itself. Regarding Homosexuals it is merely a contradiction of the concept of heterosexuality and this may appear to be an appeal to nature but this itself is contradicted when revealed that animals do not possess any form of morals or conscience. There may exist anecdotal evidence but it is not conclusive in diminishing this impediment animals suffer.